nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180727-153435-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180727s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180727-153435-0 doi eng 342 23 Avbelj, Matej Author aut We Still Haven’t Found What We’re Looking For Avbelj, Matej Verfassungsblog 2018-07-27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The diagnosis is grim. So, the CJEU should have done something! If the political class is reluctant, the law in the hands of the CJEU must be put to play. The conventional narrative has it that this has always been the case. This was the gist of the hope laid in the anticipated LM case. The CJEU has not lived up to those high expectations. This is not a landmark ruling and neither will its impact be of seismic constitutional proportions. The reason for that is, as we shall see, not the reluctance of the CJEU to address the problem seriously, but a plain fact that the expectations have been simply too high. While this is, most likely, as good as it can judicially get, the LM decision has still not brought us what we have been looking for. Nevertheless, we might be at least an inch closer toward that goal. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/we-still-havent-found-what-were-looking-for/ raw object