nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20181005-111350-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 150613s2015||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20181005-111350-0 doi eng 342 23 Lindeboom, Justin Author aut Taking the European Court of Justice up on its Name Lindeboom, Justin Verfassungsblog 2015-06-13 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recognising “justice” as inherently contestable, one might raise the more specific question what role the European Court of Justice has in (re)assuring justice in Europe, and whether the Court, insofar as it possesses a distinct role in that regard, succeeds in promoting justice. The avalanche of criticism at, amongst others, Laval, McCarthy, Dereci and, most recently, Dano, represents a deep belief that the European Court of Justice should not betray its name. In the knowledge that we fiercely disagree about what justice entails, however, it is not easy to substantiate the Court’s role and scope of responsibility. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/what-role-for-the-european-court-of-justice-integrity-regret-and-hiding-behind-a-positivist-veil-2/ raw object