nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20180423-161054 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 180423s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20180423-161054 doi eng 342 23 Morvillo, Marta Author aut What’s (still) Wrong with Glyphosate? On Pesticides, Public Trust and Parliamentary Scrutiny Morvillo, Marta Verfassungsblog 2018-04-23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Glyphosate saga that had been troubling farmers, regulators, activists and corporations for almost seven years, finally came to an end with the renewal of the authorization for the infamously notorious pesticide in December 2017. Or did it? Reacting to the widespread institutional and societal concern generated by the uncertainty over Glyphosate’s safety, the European Parliament has set up a special committee on the authorization procedure for pesticides, which held its first working meeting in Brussels on April 12th, 2018. With this, the first renewal of Glyphosate’s authorization became a major case of politicization of science in the European Union. funded by the government CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 European Parliament Glyphosat Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/whats-still-wrong-with-glyphosate-on-pesticides-public-trust-and-parliamentary-scrutiny/ raw object