Carolin Beverungen, Sigrid Gies, Daniel Thym

Germany’s Domestic „Königstein Quota System“ and EU asylum policy

Nach der Tragödie von Lampedusa wird über die Verteilung von Flüchtlingen in der EU gestritten. Wie sähe diese aus, wenn sie nach dem gleichen Schlüssel wie in Deutschland organisiert wäre? Daniel Thym, Caroline Beverungen und Sigrid Gies haben errechnet, wie dies die Lastenverteilung verändern würde - mit überraschendem Ergebnis: Es sind keineswegs nur die Grenzstaaten im Süden und Osten der Union, die die Hauptlast tragen, sondern gerade auch Länder wie Belgien oder Schweden, die über tausend Kilometer von Lampedusa entfernt liegen. Länder wie Malta und Zypern sind sicherlich überlastet, umgekehrt gibt es jedoch in den meisten osteuropäischen Staaten sowie Italien und Spanien relativ wenig Asylanträge. Continue reading >>

Christopher McCrudden

Unpacking the Luggage 2013: Christopher McCrudden

Hans Joas’ book on the genealogy of human rights, Irish detective stories, a certain American classic, and a book on labor law in the context of changing social and political environments – Christopher McCrudden did quite a bit of reading over the summer, enjoying the privilege of delving into some non-legal literature for a change. Continue reading >>

Dimitry Vladimirovich Kochenov

Turning EU Citizenship into a Viable Tool of EU Federalism

Dozens of years after the European Economic Community turned into the European Union, we are (still) speaking of the EU as an economic organisation. The Internal Market, which was one among many in a potential palette of the tools of integration became seemly the only tool . The Union has moved on from the customs union and the four types of free movement: it is about so much more now, compared even with 20 years ago. To present the Internal Market as the only tool of European Integration is thus most probably wrong. Yet, what should the alternatives be? What else can be deployed to underpin the core of EU integration next to the internal market? It is to respond to this question that a number of leading scholars on EU citizenship gathered in Oslo on September 13–14, 2013. Continue reading >>

Dean Spielmann

Unpacking the Luggage 2013: Dean Spielmann

A biography of his predecessor René Cassin, a history of Napoleon's Russian campaign from the view of the soldiers and a novel set in 19th century Den Haag - that is what ECtHR President Dean Spielmann had packed for his summer vacation. Continue reading >>

Martti Koskenniemi

Unpacking the Luggage 2013: Martti Koskenniemi

Two graphic novels did Martti Koskenniemi pack for his summer vacations, plus several books about Heidegger, Thomasius and Christian Wolff, novels about Trieste and the parodies going on at academic conferences, and an Australian novel he finds increasingly hard to finish... Continue reading >>

Hauke Delfs

How the ECtHR and National Courts Can Work Together to Improve the Protection of Human Rights

Einen großen Beitrag zur Diskussion über die Reform des Straßburger Systems leistete am vergangenen Wochenende eine Konferenz in der Göttinger Paulinerkirche, die von Anja Seibert-Fohr, Professorin in Göttingen und Mitglied des UN-Menschenrechtsausschusses, und dem EGMR-Richter Mark E. Villiger organisiert worden war. Unter der Überschrift „Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation“ wurden in transnationaler Perspektive neue Wege diskutiert, wie das Zusammenspiel zwischen der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofes und ihrer innerstaatlichen Durchsetzung verbessert werden kann. Continue reading >>

Sassan Gholiagha

From Kosovo to Syria – Why R2P is of no use if the UN Security Council is unable to act together

In the current debate regarding a possible military intervention into Syria many references to the Responsibility to Protect (or R2P) are made. Often a wrong or ill-informed understanding of the R2P is presented. What exactly is the R2P? What alternative means does the international community have if the Security Council does not act? Continue reading >>

Sven Simon

Military Strikes against Syria would be illegal

A military strike by any State against Syria for alleged use of chemical weapons would be illegal under international law unless it had been previously sanctioned by the United Nations, regardless of whether the use of chemical weapons has been proven or not. Neither the U.S. President nor the Congress is entitled to take punitive action against Syria. Continue reading >>

Gavin Phillipson

“The Guardian does not appear intimidated”: On Freedom of the Press in the UK

In Germany, a lot of people were rather shocked about last week’s news of the British government cracking down on the Guardian to have them destroy their Snowden hard drives. That seemed to be a full-blown attack on the freedom of the press, perhaps even more so than the arrest of David Miranda the day before. Some commentators have even compared the case to our own Spiegel affair back in the 60s. Do you think there is reason for concern as to the state of freedom of the press in the UK? Gavin Phillipson, constitutional lawyer from Durham, explains why the government is more afraid of the press in the UK than the press of the government. Continue reading >>

„Colorblindness is the norm“

On August 12, 2013, in a decision much welcomed by civil rights organizations, the US District Court of New York decided in Floyd vs. City of New York that the “stop and frisk” practice of the New York police violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. Judge Shira Scheindlin explained: Routine stops of African Americans and Hispanics constitute a form of “indirect racial profiling.” The City of New York is appealing the decision. On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Fisher vs. University of Texas came as a relief to civil rights activists, who had feared that affirmative action would be ruled unconstitutional. To promote diversity on campus, the University of Texas weighed belonging to a racial minority, as well as grades and other qualifications, when making admissions decisions. A rejected White applicant had gone to court because she felt racially discriminated against by this admission policy. The case was relegated back to the State Court. Doris Liebscher and Carl Melchers asked Ian Haney-López how these court decisions related to social and legal discourse on racism in the United States. Continue reading >>