This article belongs to the debate » Multiple Legalities
12 January 2021

Competing Visions, Intersecting Legalities

Head back to programme.

Next session: 14:00-15:30 CET/8:00-9:30 EST

When faced with multiple legalities, how do we know what “the law” is, and how is this notion formed by different actors coming at this question from different vantage points? This panel investigates this question through different case studies, ranging from the post-colonial state of Papua New Guinea to Northern Colombia and China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

  • Tomer Broude, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Laura Knöpfel, – King’s College London.
  • Miranda Forsyth, Australian National University
  • Discussant: B.S. Chimni,O.P. Jindal Global University
  • Moderator: Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, University of Geneva, Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement

DOWNLOAD PDF
LICENSED UNDER CC BY-SA 4.0
Export Metadata
SUGGESTED CITATION  Broude, Tomer, Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Chimni, B.S., Forsyth, Miranda; Knöpfel, Laura: Competing Visions, Intersecting Legalities, VerfBlog, 2021/1/12, https://staging.verfassungsblog.de/competing-visions-intersecting-legalities/.

Leave A Comment

WRITE A COMMENT

1. We welcome your comments but you do so as our guest. Please note that we will exercise our property rights to make sure that Verfassungsblog remains a safe and attractive place for everyone. Your comment will not appear immediately but will be moderated by us. Just as with posts, we make a choice. That means not all submitted comments will be published.

2. We expect comments to be matter-of-fact, on-topic and free of sarcasm, innuendo and ad personam arguments.

3. Racist, sexist and otherwise discriminatory comments will not be published.

4. Comments under pseudonym are allowed but a valid email address is obligatory. The use of more than one pseudonym is not allowed.