11 September 2018
VB vom Blatt: Sechs Gedanken zum Chefarzt-Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs
Einem Chefarzt an einem katholischen Krankenhaus zu kündigen, weil er als Katholik gegen das Gebot der Unauflöslichkeit der Ehe verstoßen hat, kann als religiöse Diskriminierung gegen Europarecht verstoßen. Das hat der Europäische Gerichtshof heute entschieden. Sechs Gedanken von Hans-Michael Heinig, Experte für Religionsverfassungsrecht, zu dem heutigen Grundsatzurteil aus Luxemburg. Continue reading >>
5 
On the Fragility of Detainees’ and Prisoners’ Rights in the EU
The further east in the EU one goes, the more one is overwhelmed by the state of prison conditions and the violations of prisoners’ and detainees’ rights. The situation in Bulgaria is particularly challenging because of the scale of the problem and the local authorities’ denial that it exists. Continue reading >>10 September 2018
@Maaßen – oder His Masters Voice?
Ein Geheimdienstchef, der naturgemäß im Geheimen wirkt, ist unheimlich, doch einer, der in der Öffentlichkeit verschwörerisch daherredet, ist gruselig. Was hat Hans-Georg Maaßen, Chef des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz, überhaupt auf einem Podium zu suchen? Wieso fühlte er sich gedrängt, post festum zu einem Ereignis Stellung zu nehmen, das seine Behörde nach landläufigem Verständnis geheimer Dienste qua Gefahrenprävention eher zu verhindern gehabt hätte? Was treibt einen Beamten der Inneren Sicherheit dazu, Medienberichte zu korrigieren und sensible Sprachkritik am Terminus „Hetzjagd“ zu betreiben? Continue reading >>Die Minimalvariante: Der Gesetzesentwurf der Bundesregierung zur Dritten Option
Die Bundesregierung hat am 15. August 2018 den Referentenentwurf des Bundesinnenministeriums zur Umsetzung des Dritte-Option-Beschlusses des Bundesverfassungsgerichts angenommen. Der Gesetzesentwurf wird damit ins gesetzgeberische Verfahren gehen. Mit ihm soll der Dritte-Options-Beschluss in einer Minimalvariante umgesetzt werden. Dies wird den Interessen und Rechten intergeschlechtlicher Personen nur ansatzweise gerecht. Continue reading >>How to Stop Funding Autocracy in the EU
The EU finds itself in the perverse situation of providing some of the largest transfers of funds precisely to those governments who most prominently thumb their nose at its democratic and rule-of-law norms. The legal debate about this misses the fact that the EU already has a sufficient legal basis to suspend the flow of funds to states in which rule-of-law norms are systematically violated. The real problem to date has not been the lack of adequate legal tools, but the lack of political will on the part of the European Commission to use the tools that already exist. Continue reading >>09 September 2018
Decriminalising Homosexuality in India as a Matter of Transformative Constitutionalism
What worth is a Constitution if it does not seek out the emancipation of a society’s most marginalized and excluded? Indeed, what vision ought a Constitution espouse if it isn’t a commitment to basic fundamental rights and freedoms? Ultimately, what polity must a Constitution nurture if it isn’t towards imbibing the widest and most deepest sense of inclusion and pluralism in society? All these searching questions and much more came to form a distinct part of the decision of the Indian Supreme Court (Court) when it was called upon to rule on the constitutional validly of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Continue reading >>08 September 2018
Gute Lücken, schlechte Lücken? Zur objektiv-rechtlichen Dimension des IT-Grundrechts
Staatliches Hacking von Computern und Smartphones hat Konjunktur. Online-Durchsuchung und Quellen-TKÜ mittels „Staatstrojanern“ zählen seit 2017 zu den Standardmaßnahmen im strafrechtlichen Ermittlungsverfahren. Dagegen richtet sich nun eine Verfassungsbeschwerde, die die Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte e.V. koordiniert hat. Sie rügt vor allem eine Leerstelle: Der Gesetzgeber ist seinen Verpflichtungen nicht nachgekommen, die sich aus der objektiv-rechtlichen Dimension des IT-Grundrechts ergeben. Continue reading >>Unter Beobachtung
Gerade schlägt die Entscheidung über eine Maßnahme der wehrhaften Demokratie hohe Wellen: Soll die AfD durch den Verfassungsschutz beobachtet werden? Die Nachricht, dass die Junge Alternative, die Jugendorganisation der AfD, in Bremen und Niedersachsen von den Verfassungsschutzbehörden überwacht werde, hat nun zu einer ungewöhnlichen Reaktion geführt: Auf einem außerordentlichen Bundeskongress soll die Auflösung der beobachteten Landesverbände beschlossen werden. Rechtlich stellen sich zwei Fragen: Erstens, unter welchen Bedingungen dürfen politische Organisationen durch den Verfassungsschutz beobachtet werden? Zweitens, wie steht es mit der Auflösung von Landesverbänden der JA? Continue reading >>07 September 2018
Talk to me like Lawyers do – Celmer returns to the High Court of Ireland
The Celmer case is back before the High Court of Ireland, which gave a further judgment on 01 August 2018. The decision provides a first insight into the practical application of the CJEU's ruling, most notably its encouragement of executing judicial authorities to enter into dialogue. Continue reading >>
0
06 September 2018
Parteienrecht en marche?
Die Diskussion um die Gründung einer neuen Sammelbewegung "Aufstehen" wirft viele Fragen auf. Eine davon lautet: Wie reagiert das Recht? Warum ist unser Parteienrecht so, wie es ist? Eine Anfrage – fast noch ohne Antworten. Continue reading >>Zur Reform der asylprozessualen Rechtsmittel
Aktuell wird wieder wird über eine Reform der Rechtsmittel im Asylprozess diskutiert. Das geltende Asylverfahrensrecht bildet in großen Teilen ein vom allgemeinen Verwaltungsrecht abweichendes Sonderrecht mit erheblichen rechtsstaatlichen Problemen. Es gibt also Bedarf für Reformen, die aber gerade nicht zu weiteren Lasten der rechtsstaatlichen Garantien gehen dürfen. Der folgende Text gewährt einen Überblick über die komplexen Regelungen und gegenwärtige Missstände. Continue reading >>05 September 2018
Shedding Light or Shooting in the Dark – How to define Fake News?
A proposed legislation against the “manipulation of information” is currently under consideration by the French parliament in order to tackle the problem of fake news. A sufficiently precise definition of fake news is a necessary preliminary condition to have a political or legal debate on the issue. The attempts of the French parliament have some significant shortcomings in this regard, but they can serve as a basis to elaborate a better definition. Continue reading >>
0
04 September 2018
Democratic Decay Resource (DEM-DEC): Second Monthly Bibliography Update – September 2018
DEM-DEC aims to provide useful information to academics and policymakers concerned with the creeping deterioration of democratic rule worldwide. Updates to the Bibliography will be issued on the first Monday of each month, based on new publications and suggestions from users of DEM-DEC. Continue reading >>
0
03 September 2018
My Body, the Majority’s Choice? A Comparative Overview of Abortion Laws in Ireland and Argentina
Both Argentina and Ireland have tried to move forward in the fight for the decriminalization of abortion. In Argentina, even though the approval in the Chamber of Deputies represented a very important step, the Senate majority followed the religious standards and rejected the bill. In Ireland, the referendum resulted in a victory for women. The next step is to enact the new law and, of equal importance, to create all the practical conditions to implement the new rules. Continue reading >>Spanish Jurisdiction at Stake: Puigdemont’s Judge to be Judged by a Belgian Court?
Tomorrow, a new weird chapter opens up in the „affair Puigdemont“: The Spanish Supreme Court Judge Pablo Llarena, who unsuccessfully issued the European Arrest Warrant against former Catalan premier Carles Puigdemont, is cited before a Belgian court. He is object of a civil lawsuit filed by Puigdemont who accuses the magistrate of a lack of impartiality and violating the presumption of innocence as well as his right to reputation. What is the most astonishing about this lawsuit is the fact that it is a Belgian court which shall judge the professional actions of a Spanish judge. Continue reading >>
0
02 September 2018
The Diciotti Affair: beyond the Populist Farce
After years in which Italy has been the only European country to take seriously the legal obligation to save migrants in the Mediterranean and to accept them on its territory, the Italian government calls for a broader notion of “burden sharing” which involves also a distribution of people and, hence, it proposes to cut off the link between the country of first entry and the obligation to process asylum applications on which the Dublin system relies. At a time when Germany is trying to make the “first country of entry” rule really binding, the Italian position can be hardly dismissed as unreasonable. But there is a serious risk that the current strategy of blackmailing Europe, reiterated in the Diciotti case, will end up compromising the solidity of Italian arguments and eroding the already narrow margins for negotiation in Brussels. Continue reading >>
0
30 August 2018
Schengen Entry Bans for Political Reasons? The Case of Lyudmyla Kozlovska
On 13 August 2018, Lyudmyla Kozlovska, an Ukrainian national and the President of the Open Dialog Foundation (ODF) in Poland, was detained at Brussels airport on the basis of a Polish entry ban reported into the Schengen Information System (SIS II). One day later, the Belgian border authorities deported her to Kiev, Ukraine. This case raises questions on the discretionary power of states to use the SIS II for entry bans on ‘unwanted migrants’ and the obligation of executing states, in this case Belgium, to check the legitimacy or proportionality of these other states decisions. Furthermore, this case illustrates the necessity of effective remedies against decisions reported in large-scale databases such as SIS. Continue reading >>Fighting the Backlash – The South African High Court on the Suspension of the SADC Tribunal
Today, the South African Constitutional Court may have the last word on a case concerning South Africa's suspension of the Southern African Development Community Tribunal. On 1 March 2018, the South African High Court found that this foreign policy decision violated substantive human rights. Even though it is easy to criticize the judgment for its scarce reasoning, the decision entails intriguing ideas for building a more principled foreign relations law in the South African context. Continue reading >>
0
Prosecuting a Judge that Enjoys Diplomatic Immunity: the Case of Judge Aydın Sefa Akay
After the coup attempt on 15 July 2016, more than 80,000 people have been detained in Turkey. One of the most interesting incidents was undoubtedly the arrest of International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals’ (MICT) (former) Judge Aydın Sefa Akay. The main problem in this situation was whether Judge Akay enjoyed diplomatic immunity even from his own State’s jurisdiction. What happened with Judge Akay has manifested the deficiency of international rules regarding the immunity of international judges and, moreover, that said rules must be so articulated that they leave no room for similar incidents in the future. Continue reading >>29 August 2018