31 May 2021

Mehr als nur empfundene Verpflichtung

Mit dem Ende der NATO Mission „Resolute Support“ in Afghanistan ist das Leben afghanische Ortskräfte in akuter Gefahr. Ihr Schutz durch die Bundesrepublik ist nicht nur moralisch geboten, sondern ergibt sich auch aus der Schutpflichtdimension der Grundrechte. Continue reading >>
0

Das deutsche Lieferkettengesetz

Das Lieferkettengesetz ist Meilenstein für den Schutz von Mensch und Umwelt in globalen Lieferketten. Auf den internationalen Verhandlungsprozess könnte das Lieferkettengesetz indes nicht nur stimulierend, sondern auch begrenzend wirken, indem es die Offenheit der deutschen Verhandlungsposition einschränkt. Continue reading >>
0
30 May 2021
,

Saving the Constitution from Politics

On May 23, 2021, the Israeli High Court of Justice (HCJ) delivered an important decision setting and defining the limits for the use of Basic Laws – laws of a constitutional ranking – for the purpose of solving temporary political and coalition problems. The Basic Laws are supposed to be “the crown jewels” of our constitutional system, yet in Israeli politics they have become an instrumental tool for narrow and everyday political interest, often amended in a temporary manner. The decision, given by a 6-3 majority of an extended bench, now defines some constitutional boundaries for the proper use of Basic Laws. Continue reading >>
0

Good European Neighbours

On 21 May 2021 the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Ms Rosario Silva de Lapuerta granted interim measures in the case of Czech Republic v Poland, ordering Poland to immediately cease lignite extraction activities in the Turów mine.  An action against a Member State which might have breached an EU directive – in this case by extending a lignite mining permit without carrying out an environmental impact assessment – may seem like an ordinary environmental case falling under the remit of EU law. The Czech Republic v Poland case, however, is anything but ordinary for at least two reasons. Continue reading >>
0
28 May 2021

Masks, vaccines, and investment promises

When the WHO declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, the spread of the virus was already under control in China. Ever since Beijing has been engaging in widespread health diplomacy. China aims to promote the image of China as a “responsible great power” and of Western states in as powers in decline that are unable to provide solutions for complex international affairs. Continue reading >>
0

Shell’s Responsibility for Climate Change

On 26 May 2021, the District Court of the Hague rendered a judgment  in the case Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell that can rightly be called revolutionary. This is the first judgment of its kind in which a multinational corporation is held responsible, in part based on international law, for its contribution to climate change. Continue reading >>
0
,

The Amazon Rainforest under Attack

On 13 May, the Brazilian lower house approved a controversial Bill on Environmental Licensing. The Bill has yet to receive the Senate’s final approval, but it has already attracted much criticism. The actual target of the Bill is thinly veiled: The Amazon region, where it could lead to increasing deforestation. The Bill is just another step in the regressive, anti-environment agenda implemented by the current Brazilian government. Continue reading >>
27 May 2021

The Admissibility Hurdle

The entry into force of a new Protocol in August 2021 indicates that the ECtHR will implement even more stringent admissibility criteria which provides the institution with more tools to reject legitimate applications and to hide the political motivation behind such decisions. The European Court of Human Rights has long faced burning criticism for declaring applications inadmissible when faced with prima facie flagrant human rights abuses by autocratic regimes, such as Turkey, putting in question the credibility of the Court which is expected to be a center of legal excellence. Continue reading >>

Workers vs Algorithms

On 11 May, Spain passed a new provision that regulates algorithmic transparency in the employment field. This new norm gives workers the right to be informed about the parameters, rules and instructions via which algorithms or artificial intelligence systems impact their working conditions and determine access to employment. The provision, for its novelty, appears to be ambitious, but its potential limitations and practical consequences will determine its success. Continue reading >>
0
25 May 2021

Unilateral Trade Measures in Times of Geopolitical Rivalry

The European Union’s unilateral trade policy is in motion. On 5 May 2021, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation to tackle foreign subsidies; in March 2021, the Commission launched a public consultation on an ‘anti-coercion’ instrument. As the EU is entering a new era of economic statecraft, a new balance between democratic accountability and efficient decision-making is needed. Continue reading >>

Restrisiken der Kultur

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat am 20. Mai 2021 eine Verfassungsbeschwerde prominenter Musiker:innen gegen die "Bundesnotbremse" nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Der Beschluss ist eine verpasste Chance, denn die Kammer wagt es nicht, von der Politik einzufordern, künstlerische Entfaltung (jenseits digitaler Formate) auch unter Pandemiebedingungen bei Anwendung umfassender Schutzkonzepte zu ermöglichen. Continue reading >>
0

Thieves in the temple?

In ihrem Programmentwurf zur Bundestagswahl mahnt die FDP eine Reform des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks an. Die erwartbaren Immun(-isierungs-)reak­tionen, die sie damit hervorgerufen hat, verengen dabei den notwendigen Diskurs über Auftrag und Struktur des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks. Reformen sind nicht verfassungswidrig, solange sie die verfassungsrechtlichen Rahmen für den Funktionsauftrag und die Programmautonomie der Anstalten beachten. Die Transformation ins Digitale darf den öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk nicht in eine digitale Nische führen. Continue reading >>
0
22 May 2021

The BBI Judgment and the Invention of Kenya

On 13 May 2021, the Constitutional and Human Rights Division of the High Court of Kenya delivered its judgment in David Ndii and Others vs The Attorney General and Others, widely referred to as the BBI judgment. The shape and future of the constitution is not all that is contested. So too is Kenya’s history. Continue reading >>
20 May 2021

Delhi’s Disempowerment

A recent amendment passed by the Indian Parliament enhances the power of the Central government’s representative of Delhi, and impedes the governing autonomy of the elected government in Delhi. The seeds of this potentially unconstitutional amendment lie in the Indian Supreme Court’s (SC) ambiguous and imprecise judicial reasoning in a case concerning the power tussle between the Delhi Government and the Central government. Continue reading >>
0

Digitaler Fortschritt, parteienrechtlicher Rückschritt

Es war die Pandemie, die die Parteien dazu getrieben hat, ihre Parteitage ins Internet zu verlegen. Warum, so könnte man sich fragen, die innerparteiliche Willensbildung nicht generell auf digitale Kanäle verlegen? Hat dieser Notbehelf nicht eigentlich gut geklappt? Der wegweisende CDU-Parteitag, lange verschoben, wurde online durchgeführt, die weit weniger hitzigen Versammlungen von SPD und FDP zuletzt ebenfalls. Doch was modern und neuartig klingt, ist bei genauerer Betrachtung nicht zwingend ein Fortschritt für die innerparteiliche Demokratie. Continue reading >>
0

Alibaba: Punishment and Collaboration

On 6 April 2021, Alibaba, a leading e-commerce platform, was fined $2.75 billion for abuse of dominance in the Chinese market. In the weeks that followed, Chinese regulators started investigations into other giants of the platform economy, for similar anti-competitive conduct. They signify a shift in Chinese regulators’ strong determination to crack down on monopolistic conduct. Continue reading >>
0
19 May 2021
,

Academic Freedom Under Attack in Brazil

Can the chief of a constitutional organization akin to an ombudsman prosecute a law professor who criticized him in a newspaper article? Apparently, because Brazilian Prosecutor General just filed a complaint against Constitutional Law Professor Conrado Hübner Mendes. This attack follows a wave of democratic erosion that includes attacks on universities, intellectualism, and the diversity of ideas. Continue reading >>

The Basic Structure Doctrine arrives in Kenya

On 13 May 2021, a panel of five High Court justices ruled that the so-called Basic Structure Doctrine applies in Kenya. The judgment is not only a milestone from the perspective of comparative constitutional law; it might also change the future landscape of constitutionalism in Africa. Continue reading >>
18 May 2021

Das Ende eines epochalen Verfassungsstreits

Der Zweite Senats des Bundesverfassungsgericht hat keine Bedenken, dass die Bundesregierung sein PSPP-Urteil unzureichend umgesetzt hat. Den Antrag der Kläger, die Vollstreckung anzuordnen, hat es abgelehnt. Damit ist ein denk- und merkwürdiger Verfassungsstreit zu einem Ende gekommen. Das BVerfG hat das Funktionsverständnis, das die EZB sich und ihrer Währungspolitik seit jetzt ungefähr 10 Jahren zuschreibt, nach langem Ringen gebilligt. Continue reading >>

A Ghost that Haunts European Democracies

In Turkey, Spain and Poland, lèse-majesté laws are weaponised against opposition: The conviction and imprisonment of Marxist rapper Pablo Hasél sparked mass protests across Spain, and the 20-year-old Wiktoria K. who shouted “f*** Duda” during last year’s demonstrations and received a guilty verdict on grounds of “insulting the President” in March 2021. The very existence of lèse-majesté laws poses a threat to the right to dissent. It is a vital democratic duty to cast such laws into the dustbin of history. Continue reading >>