23 May 2020
Showdown at the Last Chance Saloon
As a political slogan, and a guideline in times of crisis, ‘whatever it takes’ undoubtedly has enormous appeal, and may in certain circumstances justify novel and untried forms of action. However, in a polity governed by the rule of law, there are limits to this approach which, if not respected, may cause greater problems than those which provoked the action in the first place. Continue reading >>
1 
Eine Antwort, viele neue Fragen
Vor einem Staat, der durch Grundrechte nicht gebunden ist, muss man Angst haben. Grundrechtlich gebundene Staatsgewalt ist nicht per se daran gehindert, in Grundrechte einzugreifen, aber sie muss sich dafür im Lichte der verfassungsrechtlichen Anforderungen rechtfertigen. Vor diesem Hintergrund muss es nicht verwundern, dass man die Entwicklung der verfassungsgerichtlichen Rechtsprechung als eine Entwicklung hin zu einem immer lückenloseren Grundrechtsschutz lesen kann. Von diesem Grundsatz scheinbar ausgenommen war bislang (zumindest teilweise) staatliches Handeln außerhalb des Staatsgebietes. Continue reading >>
0
Wann kommt der Abschiebungsstopp?
In der COVID-19-Pandemie erweist sich die Situation Geflüchteter hierzulande wie anderswo als besonders prekär. Verschärft wird dies nicht zuletzt dadurch, dass der Zugang zu Rechtsberatung aktuell erheblich erschwert ist. Gleichwohl werden vollziehbar Ausreisepflichtige nach wie vor abgeschoben und zwar auch in Herkunftsstaaten, die ebenfalls von der Pandemie betroffen sind. Ist es an der Zeit für ein nationales Abschiebungsverbot oder wenigstens einen Abschiebungsstopp? Continue reading >>22 May 2020
Squaring the PSPP Circle
The PSPP judgment made a core problem of the European Union painfully visible as the supremacy of EU law clashed with national constitutional identity. There is, however, a possibility to square this circle: national apex courts could be empowered to issue ‘declarations of incompatibility’ under Article 4(2) TEU as an alternative to the disapplication of EU law. Continue reading >>Bewaffnete Drohnen für die Bundeswehr?
Der jahrelange Diskurs über die Anschaffung bewaffneter Drohnen für die Bundeswehr hat vergangenen Montag neuen Auftrieb erfahren, als im Bundesministerium der Verteidigung zur großen #Drohnendebatte2020 aufgerufen wurde, welche via Livestream und sozialen Medien einer breiten Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht wurde. In dieser Debatte ranken sich seit jeher diverse Mythen um ein Potpourri ethischer Bedenken und nationaler sowie internationaler Rechtsregeln. Der Beitrag will in die rechtlichen Aspekte etwas Klarheit bringen. Continue reading >>
0
21 May 2020
Law or Politics?
Why should a proportionality assessment of an instrument of monetary policy, which no one doubts is at least in part designed to increase money supply and combat deflation, examine that instrument’s effect on economic policy? There are two different answers—one under EU law, the other under German law. Continue reading >>Herrschaftslegitimation und implizite Identitätskontrolle
Würde sich der Gerichtshof auf die Kritik des BVerfG konstruktiv einlassen und ein Kontrollniveau etablieren, das der demokratischen und rechtstaatlichen Struktur der Union wirklich gerecht wird, wäre er am Ende der eigentliche Gewinner. Auch Reservevorbehalte des BVerfG würden sich dann von selbst erledigen. Continue reading >>Die Demokratie muss immun bleiben
In allen Bereichen des öffentlichen Lebens wurden in den vergangenen Wochen Hygienekonzepte für eine „neue Realität” mit der Corona-Epidemie entwickelt. Das gilt auch für die Verfassungsorgane. So tagte der Deutsche Bundestag in der vergangenen Woche zum wiederholten Mal im Corona-Modus: mit markierten Abständen zwischen den Abgeordneten, aber ansonsten ziemlich normal. Eines Hygienekonzepts bedarf es nun auch für die Vorbereitung und Durchführung der nächsten Bundestagswahl – und das wirft Fragen und Probleme auf, die im Zuge einer Überarbeitung des Wahlrechts vom Bundestag mit Umsicht gehandhabt werden müssen. Continue reading >>Can Parliament Exercise Effective Control over the Emergency Legislation?
Despite the enormous delegation of power under the recent emergency legislation, the Hungarian parliament is still able to exercise parliamentary scrutiny and its constitutional prerogatives. Continue reading >>
0
Verfassungsrichter in der Defensive
Huber, Voßkuhle, Lenaerts – drei Richter des BVerfG bzw. EuGH haben sich in der Presse zu Wort gemeldet, um ihre jeweiligen Urteile im Streit um die Ultra-Vires-Entscheidung zu verteidigen. Diese Reaktionen sind nicht nur rechtlich problematisch, sie drohen auch genau das zu verspielen, was die Richter zu bewahren suchen: das öffentliche Vertrauen und ihre Autorität. Continue reading >>20 May 2020
From Dialogue to Trialogue
The current clash between the Federal Constitutional Court and the ECJ should not obscure the fact that none of the two courts fits the cliché they are often turned into. A view at some ECJ decisions regarding criminal law makes this clear. Nonetheless, the dynamic between the courts must change – maybe the European citizen can step in and offer help. Continue reading >>
0
When is a Court a Court?
The PSPP decision is not the first time a national court objected the CJEU. In Ajos, for example, the Danish Supreme Court rebelled against conform interpretation. The PSPP decision is nonetheless different: It is a challenge on a whole new level. Continue reading >>
0
Lockdown v. Liberty
All around the world, countries have been imposing lockdowns to try to contain the spread of the deadly coronavirus, COVID-19. These lockdowns have severely restricted people’s movement and interaction with family members; they have had a drastic effect on social lives and religious worship; they have directly caused the loss of many jobs and they have plunged the world into a severe economic depression that will take a long time to recover from. Do we accept these restrictions because we do not believe in freedom anymore? Or do we believe that these restrictions do not really disrespect the essence of our freedom? Continue reading >>
0
19 May 2020
Why Egenberger Could Be Next
Soon, the Federal Constitutional Court will decide on the Egenberger case that raises important questions at the intersection of anti-discrimination law and religious policy. The decision is an opportunity to address critical questions to the European Court of Justice – a court that lacks dogmatic subtlety and sensitivity with regard to religion and cultural policy as an analysis of its case law shows. Continue reading >>VB Live: “Whatever it takes?” – COVID-19 as an (existential) crisis for the European Union
Session II of our discussion series on the COVID-19 crisis from a German, European and International Perspective, jointly organized by IFHV and Verfassungsblog - streamed live here on Verfassungsblog from 4:00 - 5:45 pm. Join now! Continue reading >>The Last Chance Saloon
To all intents and purposes, Orbán and his government have ceased to be democratically accountable either to the Hungarian Parliament or to the citizens of Hungary. The words in that last sentence are chosen carefully and with meaning. This blogpost suggest that Article 10 TEU may provide a basis for the exclusion of Hungarian representatives from the European Council and the Council of the European Union. Continue reading >>
0
18 May 2020
Very Unkind Things about the German Constitutional Court’s Rebellion against the ECJ in the Quantitative Easing Case.
Much has been written about the recent German Constitutional Court (GCC) ruling which has essentially dismantled the 2018 judgement of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) over the legality of the ECB Quantitative Easing Program. Much more will be written. I will limit myself here in analysing what I believe is the “macroeconomic” essence of the ruling. Continue reading >>Germany’s Failing Court
The German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP judgment depends on three intricate principles that the Court says are implicit in the German constitution, to such an extent that they are ‘unamendable’ under the ‘eternity’ clause of Article 79. These principles, however, are unique to Germany and unfamiliar in other European jurisdictions. Thereby the German Court has taken a ultimately illegitimate turn towards a narrow and inward interpretation of its constitution, which inexplicably neglects its European dimension. Given the potential effects of Germany’s apparent defiance of EU law and in light of the current ongoing discussions about the desired increased burden-sharing among the winners and losers of the Eurozone, the internal constitutional argument in Germany is a matter of great significance for the future of the Eurozone. Continue reading >>Constitutional Impasse in Ethiopia
Covid-19 makes elections hard to hold – and forced Ethiopia to reschedule its general election for the House of Representatives. It is unclear how and when the election will be held instead – a pressing issue as the canceled election was to take place only a month before the current term of office ends. Who will have the mandate to govern after this date until the Ethiopians are able to go to the polls to elect the next House of Representatives? Continue reading >>
0