Opinion 2/13 – Verfassungsblog

Support us ♥︎

19 June 2016

Maximilian Steinbeis

ICON*S 2016 Conference, Session 3: “Judicial Interview and Dialogue”, with KOEN LENAERTS, GUIDO RAIMONDI, GRÁINNE DE BÚRCA and JOSEPH H.H. WEILER

Continue reading >>

0

16 October 2015

Daniel Sarmiento

What Schrems, Delvigne and Celaj tell us about the state of fundamental rights in the EU

The overall message looks puzzling. First, privacy is a super-fundamental right that reigns supreme above all other rights after the Court’s decision in Schrems. Second, national electoral rules governing the right to vote in elections to the European Parliament come under the scope of application of the Charter, but Member States can restrict such a right as long they do so in a proportionate way, says the Court in Delvigne. And third, illegal immigrants who have already been ordered to abandon the territory of the EU can be subject to criminal prosecution if they ever return, according to the Court in Celaj. In sum, Privacy is a super-fundamental right. The right to vote is quite super, but not as much. The rights to liberty and free movement are not super at all, at least when they concern third country nationals. Is this the kind of case-law one would expect from a fundamental rights court? Does this make any sense at all? Maybe it does. Continue reading >>

1

Email
GE EN This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. I hereby subscribe to receive information about new articles and services of verfassungsblog.de. I know that I may withdraw my consent at any time. More information in the privacy policy.

I would like to receive the newsletter!

to receive information about new articles and services of Verfassungsblog.de. I know that I may withdraw my consent at any time. More information in the privacy policy.

This site is registered on Toolset.com as a development site.